Main research topics:

Immunomodulation of radiation and combination therapies

Dr. Alexander Helm

In contrast to the putative anti-inflammatory and immune suppressive effects of low doses on the organism, higher doses of radiation can trigger immune reactions that can improve the treatment outcome. Such reactions can be useful particularly in the therapy of metastatic cancer disease and hence combination of radiation and immunotherapies represents a powerful tool. In our research we investigate the response of (radiation-resistant) tumor cells to radiation with low and high LET (linear energy transfer, photons versus particles), with the aim of supporting the killing of tumor cells by activating an immune response [16, 17]. In an in vivo model system (osteosarcoma, metastases in the lungs), we were able to demonstrate that carbon ions – in combination with immunotherapy (so-called checkpoint inhibitors), and also alone – could fight lung metastases more effectively than photons used in comparison [18]. Our current research activities are devoted to checking these promising results in other (human) cell lines as well as clarifying the mechanisms involved and how carbon ion therapy can be beneficial. We also investigate the combination of carbon ion radiotherapy with different immunotherapies such as anti-cancer mRNA vaccines [19].

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) alone leads to a reduction of lung metastases in an osteosarcoma in vivo model, which is not the case for conventional photon therapy (XRT), when compared to untreated negative controls (NC). Addition of immunotherapy (Figure 1: a mix checkpoint inhibitors, CPI) fosters the immunogenic response, leading to further reduction of lung metastases. This shows the vast potential for CIRT as a match in combination with immunotherapy in terms of checkpoint blockade [17].

Carbon ion radiotherapy for HPV-negative tumors

Dr. Silvana Miranda

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) comprise a group of malignancies classified according to their anatomical site of origin (Figure 3). They are among the most common cancers worldwide and represent a major global health burden [20]. Radiotherapy is one key player in the treatment of HNSCC, however, it may cause challenging side effects that have a big impact on the patient’s quality of life [20, 21]. Additionally, HNSCC display marked heterogeneity in their tumor biology, depending on whether or not there is an human papilloma virus (HPV) infection [22]. HPV-positive tumors typically more sensitive to radiation and are generally more recognized by the immune system and respond better to treatment [23, 24]. On the other hand HPV-negative tumors are known to be more resistant to therapy, have poorer clinical outcomes and create an immunosuppressive microenvironment [22, 25]. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), due to its inverted dose-depth profile, offers superior dose conformity and sparing of surrounding tissues, which is particularly valuable in the anatomically complex head and neck region, helping prevent radiation-induced side effects [26, 27]. Additionally, in vitro  studies have shown a decreased survival of HPV-negative cell lines compared to photon irradiation (Figure 4) [28]. Moreover, CIRT causes complex DNA damage on the cancer cells, activates distinct cell death pathways, and potentially, induces a more robust immune system activation, compared to conventional radiotherapy modalities [27, 29].

In our research, we investigate how CIRT can modulate radiation responses, tumor control and immune activation mechanisms in oral carcinoma model, with different HPV backgrounds. We address these questions using a combined in vitro and in vivo approach, including oral cancer cell lines engineered to express HPV derived oncoproteins, that are used to investigate radiation immune system activation responses.

Additionally we support reasearch activities concerning immunomodulatory effects of our colleagues from other groups of the Biophysics Department.

References:

[16] Ebner et al. 2017, Front Immunol., 8:99 (2017)

[17] Helm et al. 2018, Int J Part Ther., 5:84-93 (2018)

[18] Helm et al. 2021, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys., 109:594-602 (2021)

[19] Salomon et al. 2024, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys., 119(3):936-945. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.042 

[20] Mody et al. 2021, The Lancet., 398(10318):2289-2299. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01550-6

[21] Brook 2020, Radiat Oncol J. 2020;38(2):84-92. doi:10.3857/roj.2020.00213

[22] Ochoa et al. 2022, Cancers, 14(17):4321. doi:10.3390/cancers14174321

[23] Kimple et al. 2013, Cancer Res. 2013;73(15):4791-4800. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0587

[24] Taneja et al. 2024, Oral Oncol Rep. 10:100451. doi:10.1016/j.oor.2024.100451

[25] Galati et al. 2022 Tumour Virus Res. 14:200245. doi:10.1016/j.tvr.2022.200245

[26] Scalliet et al. 2017 CERN Yellow Rep Sch Proc. 1:1-1. doi:10.23730/CYRSP-2017-001.1

[27] Helm et al. 2023 Strahlenther Onkol. 199(12):1225-1241. doi:10.1007/s00066-023-02158-7

[28] Tiwari et al. 2022 Front Oncol. 12. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.878675

[29] Goodhead 1999 J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 1999;40(Suppl):S1-S13. doi:10.1269/jrr.40.S1


Loading...